1895 Week 10 College Football Team Rankings
1895 rankings calculated with the Classic formula (Ken's 2016-based hybrid, applied retroactively); records, NOW and game results come from James Howell's historical college football score archive.
| Rank | Change | Rating | Team | Conf | Record | Win % | Place | NOW | Game Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0.334 | IND FBSI | 4–0 | 1.000 | 1 | +3 | Beat Lake Forest 40–0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0.421 | IND FBSI | 7–0 | 1.000 | 1 | +20 | Beat Cornell 25–0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0.498 | IND FBSI | 9–0 | 1.000 | 1 | +4 | Beat Duquesne A.c. 30–0; Beat LAFAYETTE 30–0 | |
| 4 | -3 | 0.615 | IND FBSI | 3–1 | 0.750 | 9 | +10 | Beat Dartmouth 6–0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 0.707 | IND FBSI | 8–0–1 | 0.944 | 5 | +17 | Beat Williams 54–0; Tied BOSTON A.C. 0–0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 1.061 | IND FBSI | 5–0–1 | 0.917 | 6 | +10 | Tied Illinois 10–10 | |
| 7 | -2 | 1.080 | IND FBSI | 8–0 | 1.000 | 1 | +4 | Beat Lehigh 16–0; Beat UNION (NEW YORK) 22–0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 1.789 | IND FBSI | 2–1–1 | 0.625 | 14 | 0 | Tied Wisconsin 10–10 | |
| 9 | -1 | 1.940 | Chicago (CHICAGO) | IND FBSI | 7–2 | 0.778 | 8 | 0 | Beat Armour 24–4; Lost to MINNESOTA 6–10 |
| 10 | 4 | 2.126 | IND FBSI | 4–2 | 0.667 | 10 | +4 | Beat M.i.t. 14–0; Beat LEHIGH 22–4 | |
| 11 | 4 | 2.337 | IND FBSI | 4–1 | 0.800 | 7 | +10 | Beat Chicago 10–6 | |
| 12 | 0 | 2.562 | IND FBSI | 4–2 | 0.667 | 10 | +3 | BYE | |
| 13 | -3 | 2.745 | IND FBSI | 5–3–1 | 0.611 | 15 | -1 | Beat Boston University 12–0; Lost to ARMY 0–6 | |
| 14 | 4 | 2.755 | Wesleyan (WESLEYAN) | IND FBSI | 4–2 | 0.667 | 10 | -2 | Beat Tufts 16–10 |
| 15 | -4 | 2.844 | IND FBSI | 3–2 | 0.600 | 16 | +2 | Beat Ursinus 56–0; Lost to PENNSYLVANIA 0–30 | |
| 16 | 1 | 3.453 | Trinity (connecticut) (TRINITY (CONNECTICUT)) | IND FBSI | 2–2 | 0.500 | 17 | 0 | BYE |
| 17 | 2 | 3.633 | IND FBSI | 2–1 | 0.667 | 10 | +3 | BYE | |
| 18 | 2 | 4.029 | Amherst (AMHERST) | IND FBSI | 3–3 | 0.500 | 17 | +9 | BYE |
| 19 | 3 | 4.744 | IND FBSI | 3–4 | 0.429 | 22 | +2 | Beat Iowa 24–0 | |
| 20 | -4 | 4.819 | IND FBSI | 2–2–1 | 0.500 | 17 | -2 | Lost to Harvard 0–25 | |
| 21 | 2 | 4.969 | IND FBSI | 3–3 | 0.500 | 17 | -5 | Beat Worcester Tech 10–6; Lost to WESLEYAN 10–16 | |
| 22 | -9 | 5.965 | IND FBSI | 3–3 | 0.500 | 17 | 0 | Lost to Yale 0–54; Lost to CRESCENT A.C. 0–43 | |
| 23 | -2 | 6.832 | IND FBSI | 1–3 | 0.250 | 24 | -2 | Lost to Princeton 0–16; Lost to BROWN 4–22 | |
| 24 | 0 | 7.723 | IND FBSI | 3–5 | 0.375 | 23 | -2 | Lost to Chicago A.c. 0–30; Lost to MICHIGAN 0–40; Beat MICHIGAN MILITARY ACADEMY 16–0 | |
| 25 | 0 | 7.729 | IND FBSI | 0–2 | 0.000 | 26 | 0 | Lost to Princeton 0–22 | |
| 26 | 1 | 10.573 | IND FBSI | 1–4 | 0.200 | 25 | -7 | Beat Pittsfield A.c. 6–0 | |
| 27 | -1 | 11.329 | IND FBSI | 0–2 | 0.000 | 26 | -5 | Lost to Brown 0–14 |